> >> probably not wrong. It seems extremely unwise to name anything
> >> important "core", if only because people write scripts that find and
> In order to follow the theory of least-surprise, I'd say that especially
> in a development environment as the kernel, you shouldn't have
> files/directories being part of the source tree that are named "core".
I'll third that motion.
Linus, how about "kcore" or "base" in the next release?
_________________________________
Joe Fouche | 75 B1 63 3F 0C 68 AA 77 | finger now for
Kingsport, TN, US | 3B 49 AF 89 63 BB E9 C3 | PGP public key
http://www.preferred.com/~jfouche