Re: bdflush/update no longer necessary?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Eckes: "Re: kernel stack torture"
• Previous message: Robin Cutshaw: "shared irq patch for de4x5"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin Neuwirther: "bdflush/update no longer necessary?"

> the kernel. The code in the kernel looks as if it could replace the o=
ld
> update/bdflush daemon.

Certainly not. The new kernel thread replaces the bdflush process of
the user-land update/bdflush. You still have to run update. You do not
have to change anything to your setup.

--=20
Thomas.Quinot@cuivre.fdn.fr

• Next message: Eckes: "Re: kernel stack torture"
• Previous message: Robin Cutshaw: "shared irq patch for de4x5"
• Maybe in reply to: Martin Neuwirther: "bdflush/update no longer necessary?"