Re: bdflush/update no longer necessary?

Jauder Ho (jauderho@umich.edu)
Wed, 21 Feb 1996 23:55:06 -0500 (EST)


So has anyone found out whether doing /sbin/update -0 60 works better?

--Jauder

On 20 Feb 1996, Thomas Quinot wrote:

> Martin Neuwirther (martin@esi.ac.at) =E9crit :
>=20
> > the kernel. The code in the kernel looks as if it could replace the=
old
> > update/bdflush daemon.
>=20
> Certainly not. The new kernel thread replaces the bdflush process of
> the user-land update/bdflush. You still have to run update. You do no=
t
> have to change anything to your setup.
>=20
> --=20
> Thomas.Quinot@cuivre.fdn.fr
>=20
>=20

.sig under construction