Re: signal(SIGFPE,SIG_IGN), possible solution?
Pat Crean (pat@parrett.net)
Sat, 27 Apr 1996 21:05:53 +0000
> On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, Ben Wing wrote:
> >
> > Linus (who has obviously gotten a bit frazzled from working so hard
> > on the kernel lately) sees fit to rant:
>
> guilty as charged..
>
> For somebody else it may not be. And the kernel has to assume the worst,
> for the simple reason that it can't _tell_ what the program wants. I have
> yet to add the ESP-driver to the kernel to read the mind of the user..
>
Oh, please, please, give this new, delightful driver your highest
priority. I've needed this feature for years!!!!