Re: strange load average

Russell Berry (rberry@albany.net)
Fri, 10 May 1996 10:44:48 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Jaco Greeff: "Re: Kernels - What's in and what's out. [Re: Post 2.0 idea]"
Previous message: root: "Not show users?"
In reply to: Brian M Grunkemeyer: "Re: ideas"
Next in thread: Jochen Heuer: "Re: strange load average"

I found that when I used xlock, and would return to the machine
after some time, the load would be very high. Setting xlock to -mode
blank stopped that. Are you running xlock?

---russ

On Thu, 9
May 1996, Thomas [ISO-8859-1] K=F6nig wrote:

> The load average of my 1.3.99 machine is up to 1.0, and I have
> no idea why. I can see no strange process doing things it should
> not be doing, ...
> --=20
> Thomas Koenig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, ig25@dkauni2.bitne=
t.
> The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double
> logarithmic diagram.
>=20
>=20

Next message: Jaco Greeff: "Re: Kernels - What's in and what's out. [Re: Post 2.0 idea]"
Previous message: root: "Not show users?"
In reply to: Brian M Grunkemeyer: "Re: ideas"
Next in thread: Jochen Heuer: "Re: strange load average"