Re: The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14

SouL THieF (root@falcon.netrom.com)
Sun, 9 Jun 1996 11:15:16 -0400 (EDT)


On Sun, 9 Jun 1996, Bjorn Ekwall wrote:

> James B. MacLean <macleajb@ednet.ns.ca> wrote:
> > On Jun 7, 1:08pm, Dave Baker wrote:
> > > >> gcc2_compiled. undefined
> > > >> [snip]
> > > >> Failed to load module! The symbols from kernel 1.99.14 don't match 1.99.14
> > > isn't this just the bug that requires upgrading to modules1.3.69k ??
>
> Yup! (or just applying my web-page patch for modules-1.3.57)
>

Check out http://netrom.com/~soul it has shit loads of info on upgrading
to the new kernel!

> > At my site
> > it was due to compiling the kernel with all the CONFIG_MOD... on etc...
> > but NOT having the first option for allowing experimental options
> > (CONFIG_EXPERMINTAL).
>
> Strange... Why do _I_ never have any of those problems... :-)
> Perhaps my setup behaves because of its close proximity to Finland...
>
> OTOH there might be problems with some modules if the _modules_ are
> guarded by CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL. Was that it?
>
>
> Bjorn <bj0rn@blox.se> <http://www.pi.se/blox/>
>
>