Re: Ideas for v2.1

Dwight Hubbard (Dwight.Hubbard@mci.com)
Mon, 17 Jun 1996 11:28:29 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Al Longyear: "Re: Linux 2.0.0 fails to return Text File Busy for .so files"
Previous message: Leonard N. Zubkoff: "Re: 2.2.0 wishlist"
Next in thread: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: Ideas for v2.1"
Reply: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: Ideas for v2.1"

> As a SCSI user, I put my vote in for using a naming convention
> like: c0t0l0 (controller, target (device), LUN)
> but what about the _FUTURE_?? Ultra SCSI devices can be dynamically
> reconfigured by software to a different target number. Or will Linux
> decide now to _NEVER_ use such a feature?

Or what about a person with two removeable media SCSI drives. It
would be nice it the mountpoint could be specific to the actual
removeable disk so it doesn't matter which removeable drive the disk
is mounted in.
Dwight Hubbard
MCI ISN Tech Support MCIMAIL: 200-1654
VNET 820-6403 INNERMAIL: dwight.hubbard@mci.com

Next message: Al Longyear: "Re: Linux 2.0.0 fails to return Text File Busy for .so files"
Previous message: Leonard N. Zubkoff: "Re: 2.2.0 wishlist"
Next in thread: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: Ideas for v2.1"
Reply: Andrew E. Mileski: "Re: Ideas for v2.1"