Re: route broken in 2.0.7

Jon Lewis (jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net)
Sat, 20 Jul 1996 14:04:48 -0400 (EDT)


On Thu, 18 Jul 1996, Nick Kralevich wrote:

>
> Well, this may be a minor problem, but it should also be pretty easy to
> fix. Look at the "use" numbers for the command route.

Join the club. I reported the same "bug" a few weeks ago. It's because
of the new route cache. Have a look at /proc/net/rt_cache. The low use
numbers in /proc/net/route are what you're supposed to be seeing now.