Re: 1.2.8 -> 2.0.8 problem

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 31 Jul 1996 19:16:15 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: further.."
Previous message: Eric Princen: "Re: Not a bible thumper. . ."
In reply to: Eberhard Moenkeberg: "Re: 2.0.9 versus 2.0.10 : fs/isofs/inode.c"

> Its only 2.5.8 I'm pretty sure, except for the -fno-strength-reduce
> which is needed for 2.7.2.

Some code doesnt come out correctly with gcc 2.6.2, it may be ok with 2.5.8
but I wouldnt like to trust it. 2.4.5 is right out ;)

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: further.."
Previous message: Eric Princen: "Re: Not a bible thumper. . ."
In reply to: Eberhard Moenkeberg: "Re: 2.0.9 versus 2.0.10 : fs/isofs/inode.c"