Re: Lockups on 2.0.15-2.0.18

Kevin Fenzi (kevin@scrye.com)
09 Sep 1996 08:15:59 -0600


>>>>> "Anthony" == Anthony Pardini <apardini@computek.net> writes:

Anthony> Alan Cox posted a patch against 2.0.17 that was supposed to
Anthony> fix some SMP problems.. I just tried 2.0.18 thinking it would
Anthony> be correted there but I was wrong. Time to try the patch I
Anthony> guess. I have the same symtoms.. kernels less than 2.0.15
Anthony> work with SMP new ones do not. i'll forward you the post
Anthony> alan made..

Argh. Thats what I get for not paying attention. :(
I must have glanced over Alans posting and not registered it. ;(

Oh well, I will try and recompile .18 with the .14 irq.h and see what
that gets me. ;)

for those who missed it, here is the post:

Alan> Having spent some time investigating this I can now
Alan> categorically say that the irq.h changes in 2.0.15,16 and 17 are
Alan> causing inter processor interrupts to be lost. Why I don't know
Alan> yet, but to get SMP working with the current kernels use the
Alan> include/asm-i386/irq.h from 2.0.14.

Alan> Non SMP kernels will generally survive dropping interrupts so
Alan> this may well be a more general problem.

Alan> Alan

And from Alan in this thread:

Alan> The kernel was changed to use specific IRQ acknowlegdes. That
Alan> causes some chipsets to lose interrupts. Why and if thats a
Alan> hardware or software problem we don't know but using the 2.0.14
Alan> include/asm-i386/irq.h with .18 should work for you. Let me know

Any ideas when/if this will get fixed?
Is there anything we can do to help track it down to a hardware or
software problem?

kevin

-- 
Kevin Fenzi           |  Alternative Collegiate |acca@acca.nmsu.edu
kevin@scrye.com       |  Computing Association  |pgp2.6.2 key by request
WWW -> http://scrye.com/~kevin/
                 kfenzi@uswest.com
		          bob@acca.nmsu.edu