PPro compile

Stephen Pisuk (smp@ram.res.cmu.edu)
Wed, 11 Sep 1996 22:05:12 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Craig Milo Rogers: "Re: [off-topic] Fully virtualisable CPUs"
Previous message: gen_mail@webhelper.webexpress.net: "Can in.pop3d v 1.004.shadow handle the load?"
Next in thread: Robert L Krawitz: "Re: PPro compile"
Maybe reply: Robert L Krawitz: "Re: PPro compile"

Can I ask this dumb question. If , as Intel claims, the PPro performs
better on 386 code then 486-Pentium code, why does the kernel compile
with m486 rather than m386?

Maybe I'm just an idiot.

Next message: Craig Milo Rogers: "Re: [off-topic] Fully virtualisable CPUs"
Previous message: gen_mail@webhelper.webexpress.net: "Can in.pop3d v 1.004.shadow handle the load?"
Next in thread: Robert L Krawitz: "Re: PPro compile"
Maybe reply: Robert L Krawitz: "Re: PPro compile"