Re: PPro compile

Robert L Krawitz (rlk@tiac.net)
Fri, 13 Sep 1996 14:26:38 -0400


Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:49:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Andrew E. Mileski" <aem@nic.ott.hookup.net>

> Can I ask this dumb question. If , as Intel claims, the PPro performs
> better on 386 code then 486-Pentium code, why does the kernel compile
> with m486 rather than m386?

I've never seen such a claim.

Intel has claimed that 32-bit unsegmented code runs faster though.

One reason that 486-optimized code might be less efficient is that
just about everything is aligned on a 16 byte boundary, so the code's
bloated.

-- 
Robert Krawitz <rlk@tiac.net>           http://www.tiac.net/users/rlk/

Member of the League for Programming Freedom -- mail lpf@uunet.uu.net Tall Clubs International -- tci-request@aptinc.com or 1-800-521-2512