Re:re:re: Panic on 1.2-Found

Jon Lewis (jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net)
Thu, 14 Nov 1996 01:19:07 -0500 (EST)


On Wed, 13 Nov 1996, Scott J. Ellentuch wrote:

> I'm amazed at the attitude of "Get off 1.2". If you notice, there was
> no need for such an option in 1.2, since it was quite stable. I guess
> 2.X isn't as stable and needs such an option. I need it since I have a disk
> glitch that I can't get to to fix and would rather just have the machine
> reboot. My brand new Pentium Pro 200/64M system will be running 2.0.22, and
> DAMN sure lilo will have append="panic=30" incase it wants to get cranky

Stability is in the eye of the beholder. I have systems than ran 90 days
with 2.0.10 and were rebooted for kernel upgrades and because of ping
attacks, that couldn't make it more than a few days with stock 1.2.13, or
a few weeks with every 1.2.13 patch I could lay my hands on. 1.2.13 has
numerous very serious bugs...you're just not running into most of them.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______