Re: EDO RAM

Paul Flinders (ptf@datasci.co.uk)
Thu, 14 Nov 1996 17:54:48 -0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Boris Tobotras: "Oops in 2.1.9"
Previous message: Philippe Strauss: "2.1.9: socket destroy delayed are back!"
Maybe in reply to: Nicholas J. Leon: "EDO RAM"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: EDO RAM"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: EDO RAM"

> From: Derrik Pates <dpates@cavern.nmsu.edu>
> I have my doubts about the ASuS boards. They are notorious for crippling
> the memory bus on their Pentium boards down to 32 bits, instead of the
> full 64. I don't know if that might cause problems with Linux, but I just
> don't trust 'em.

Would you care to name names (or boards)

Next message: Boris Tobotras: "Oops in 2.1.9"
Previous message: Philippe Strauss: "2.1.9: socket destroy delayed are back!"
Maybe in reply to: Nicholas J. Leon: "EDO RAM"
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: EDO RAM"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: EDO RAM"