Re: Unicode status

Steve VanDevender (stevev@efn.org)
Sat, 30 Nov 1996 10:49:08 -0800

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Michael Bruck: "Re: Unicode status"
Previous message: Greg Patterson: "RE: It's probably me, but ..."
In reply to: Michael Bruck: "Re: Unicode status"

Michael Bruck writes:
> At 18:38 29.11.1996 +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >We have full klingon console support just in case
>
> As far as I remember klingon has much shorter expressions then human
> languages and we could change over to klingon conversations in the
> USENET reducing network traffic and solving many of our bandwidth
> problems...

Not to mention the vastly improved ability to flame in Klingon.

Next message: Michael Bruck: "Re: Unicode status"
Previous message: Greg Patterson: "RE: It's probably me, but ..."
In reply to: Michael Bruck: "Re: Unicode status"