Re: X much slower in 2.0.24 than in 1.2.13

Nuno Miguel Grilo (grilo@rcu124.rnl.ist.utl.pt)
Fri, 1 Nov 1996 23:49:02 GMT

In article <55d0on$81@nntp1.u.washington.edu> you wrote:
: Can anyone explain this?
:
: 2.0.24 1.2.13
: -----------------------------------------
: 328430 722646 lineStones
: 104285 175128 fillStones
: 99677 157210 blitStones
: 7024585 13667733 arcStones
: 160187 306625 textStones
: 363071 371830 complexStones
: 156651 268754 xStones
:

The tests I made gave the following results:

Linux 2.0.21 Linux 2.0.23 Linux 2.0.24
XFree86 3.1.2G XFree86 3.2 XFree86 3.2
---------------------------------------------------
562143 520990 266274 lineStones
115116 106969 72958 fillStones
69564 63619 54042 blitStones
8297678 8376865 7669011 arcStones
190625 189406 97812 textStones
206666 187973 206993 complexStones
152523 142851 98572 xStones

The 2.0.23 and 2.0.24 kernels had the same configuration (the 2.0.21
I don't remenber).

My system has an AMD 5x86 overclocked to 160MHz, 16MB of memory and an
ExpertColor S3 Trio64V+ video board with 2MB

-- 
Nuno Miguel Grilo
l38486@alfa.ist.utl.pt