Re: source dependencies cleanup? [was: Re: Linux-2.0.27 and 2.1.14]

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 4 Dec 1996 21:11:56 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: PNP patch into kernel when?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro (making it work) (fwd)"

> > In cases where there is a missing dependency, it might make sense to have
> > a dummy include file... a placeholder. The c source would be simplified by
> > having fewer conditionals.
>
> i think it would be a bit unclear why we have 'vm86.h' in asm-sparc?

Even more so when we have vm86 in the sparc libc

Next message: Alan Cox: "Re: PNP patch into kernel when?"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: Intel EtherExpress Pro (making it work) (fwd)"