Well to start with the Linux 2.0 UFS stuff isnt very finished. The
second item that might be trying to bite you is that I would expect
the catridge will also have OSF mach disk labels rather than PC partiton
or BSD disklabels on it
> What am I missing about the UFS filesystem support under Linux, or, for
> that matter, what am I misunderstanding about UFS in general? Is it
> really not a 'standard'?
UFS is a set of 'standards'. For moving stuff between systems I've yet
to find anything that beats tar to the disk raw
Alan