The argument has been raised that the 2.1.* kernels are "development"
code and people should accepts whatever they get. I believe that this
idea in its extreme form is counterproductive for the overall
development of Linux -- when someone makes a global change (e.g.,
removing a member from a central kernel data structure) that makes a
bunch of code no longer compile, it would be far less work overall if
the person who did so would make at least a quick fix, rather than
having dozens of other developers go through the laborious process of
trying to figure out what the problem is and what a workable fix is --
especially since they might not know what the global change is
supposed to do!
There is no net benefit in having a dozen or more threads of
development held up in order to make one move along a little faster.
Dale
-- Dale R. Worley Ariadne Internet Services Voice: +1 617-899-7949 Fax: +1 617-899-7946 E-mail: worley@ariadne.com "Internet-based electronic commerce solutions to real business problems."