> On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> >
> > You made some sense up until here:
> >
> > On Tue, 28 Jan 1997, Richard B. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > If memory isn't freed, here's another "denial of services" ...
> >
> > Any DOS attack could just as easily not call 'free'.
>
> I am NOT talking about DOS.
Umm... DOS = Denial Of Service...
Anyway, the point was clear: if you want a denial-of-service attack, you
can as well not free the memory at all.
Ionut
--
It is better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool,
than to open it and remove all doubt.