Re: [masq] 1st virus in Linux :( (fwd)

Nathan Bryant (nathan@burgessinc.com)
Mon, 10 Feb 1997 10:54:04 -0500 (EST)


On Sat, 8 Feb 1997, Solitude wrote:

> On Fri, 7 Feb 1997, Neil Moore wrote:
>
> > > On Fri, 7 Feb 1997 tyson@rwii.com wrote:
> > > I don't agree. Doom has a known bug which allows any user on your system
> > > to get root if doom is installed setuid root. Every Linux distribution
> > > I've ever used installs Doom setuid root, and RedHat has only recently
> > > released a patch to correct this. (The patch doesn't fix doom, just
> > > removes the setuid bit.)
> >
> > Why not just delete it?
>
> Doom is actually one of two programs: xdoom or sdoom. I think there is
> also a framebuffer version of xdoom. (That's the case in quake) sdoom
> uses svgalib and requires that suid root is set. xdoom works w/o suid.
> svgalib sucks anyway...

Unfortunately there is no DGA version of Doom. (Doom was released long
before DGA became available.) It would be nice if X servers other than
XFree86 supported DGA, too. :(

+-----------------------+---------------------------------------+
| Nathan Bryant | Unsolicited commercial e-mail WILL be |
| nathan@burgessinc.com | charged an $80/hr proofreading fee. |
+-----------------------+---------------------------------------+