That will mean nightmares for tape block size calculation, don't do
that!
> > This is 1996, and a disk MB is 10^6, like it or not.
>
> Why should a disk MB be different from a RAM MB? Just because of the
> marketdroids thought it was a good idea? "OUT, OUT!" said Saint Dogbert to
> the Demons of Stupidity.
Don't forget that a hard disk is nonetheless made up of sectors, which
are usually in 512B size. So if, the size of a disk is small, the
convenience to use k=1024 will make the size calculation neater, just
divide the no. of sector by 2, and no decimal point ever. But for
larger size, it comes the incentive to use k=1000 and M=10^6 for
marketing!
Oh NO! The size of RAM chips is just climbing up following hard disk
size, I can't tolerate in one day to see the ads for a 65.5Mb RAM chip
on sale!
> Johan Myreen
> jem@iki.fi
Stephen.
-- \////// Stephen Siu Ming Wong Internet: stephenwong@cuhk.edu.hk [ O O ] Dept of Computer Science smwong@cs.cuhk.edu.hk \_-_/ Chinese University of _| |_ Hong Kong Pager: 7229-4680 / \_/ \ ____________________________________________________________oOOO___OOOo__