Re: Behavior under swap catastrophe?

Harald Anlauf (anlauf@crunch.ikp.physik.th-darmstadt.de)
Fri, 14 Feb 1997 10:28:43 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Stefan Stefanov: "DIGI board processes"
Previous message: Kutsal BerberoGlu: "Re: VFS: No free inodes - contact Linus"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Fouche: "Behavior under swap catastrophe?"
Next in thread: Olaf Titz: "Re: Behavior under swap catastrophe?"

AIX used to send SIGDANGER to the largest process only in version 3.1.x,
3.2 fixes this to save daemons, X-Servers etc. from dying. Now the
newest process(es) gets sig'ged first, AFAIK.

-Harald

Next message: Stefan Stefanov: "DIGI board processes"
Previous message: Kutsal BerberoGlu: "Re: VFS: No free inodes - contact Linus"
Maybe in reply to: Joe Fouche: "Behavior under swap catastrophe?"
Next in thread: Olaf Titz: "Re: Behavior under swap catastrophe?"