The real problem is that fd's should be dynamically allocated
On Tue, 25 Mar 1997, Jon Lewis wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, Oskar Pearson wrote:
>
> > > Do you have to "do" anything to libc? Or just build it?
> > I am just re-building it. I believe that this was needed with the previous
> > patches (I think that things like "open" wouldn't allow people to open
> > more than X fd's if they used the libc stuff. Tell me if I am wrong, people)
>
> With michael's >256 fd patch, open does work without hacking libc.
>
> I'm still getting an unusual amount of "Couldn't get a free page....."
> messages running with this patch. My IRC server / mail relay has been
> running 2.0.29 with this patch for 5 days.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> Jon Lewis <jlewis@fdt.net> | Unsolicited commercial e-mail will
> Network Administrator | be proof-read for $199/hr.
> ________Finger jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net for PGP public key_______
>
>