>Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 00:24:18 -0800 (PST)
>From: mdean <mdean@best.com>
>To: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
>Cc: kumar@kumdev.com, fishbowl@fotd.netcomi.com,
> linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
>Subject: Re: >4294967296 fd patch...
>
>
>
>Re: >256 fd patch...
>
>The real problem is that fd's should be dynamically allocated
>
I thought that was the point of Oskar's patch?!
Otherwise what was the point? We already have a
broken method of doing this.
-- g-r-a-t-e-f-u-l-l-y---[ email:<fishbowl@conservatory.com> ]---l-i-v-i-n-g d-e-a-d-i-c-a-t-e-d---[ http://www.conservatory.com/~fishbowl ]-----l-i-g-h-t One person's error is another person's data.