> On Mon, 31 Mar 1997 12:23:18 -0500 (EST),
> "Richard B. Johnson" <root@analogic.com> wrote:
> >
> >Well... the patch was against 2.0.30 and I'm using 2.1.29 so it didn't
> >come close enough to fix.
>
> Your mail to linux-kernel did not say which kernel you were running,
> always a nice thing to know. The 2.1.x tcp code is sufficiently
> different from 2.0.x that I don't want to fit the 2.0.30 patch to
> 2.1.29 right now. Can you run the tcpdump trace on both ends of the
> link and mail me the results? Which kernel are the two ends running?
>
I am running 2.1.29 (sometimes .30 when I dare). I will do a download
tommorrow night and send you the results. I have to take a work-break
tonight and the phone lines are bad because of a bad North Easter
Snow storm.
>
Cheers,
Dick Johnson
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Richard B. Johnson
Project Engineer
Analogic Corporation
Voice : (508) 977-3000 ext. 3754
Fax : (508) 532-6097
Modem : (508) 977-6870
Ftp : ftp@boneserver.analogic.com
Email : rjohnson@analogic.com, johnson@analogic.com
Penguin : Linux version 2.1.29 on an i586 machine (66.15 BogoMips).
Warning : I read unsolicited mail for $350.00 per hour. Supply billing address.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-