Re: bug in /dev/full ??

Pavel Machek (pavel@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz)
Tue, 1 Apr 1997 11:48:15 +0200 (MET DST)


On Tue, 1 Apr 1997, Steven S. Dick wrote:

[snip]

> Is this what /dev/full should do on read?
> What would a more correct behavior be?

This is exactly what /dev/full is expected to do...

--
This is my little buggy signature...				Pavel
GCM d? s-: !g p?:+ au- a--@ w+ v- C++@ UL+++ L++ N++ E++ W--- M- Y- R+