Re: 2.0000

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 1 Apr 1997 18:40:01 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Richard Ketchersid: "Undefined Symbols in 2.1.30"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: your mail"

> Oh yearh.. I know, kernel hacking is good... But Linux will never be a real
> commercially-supported OS, if a release kernel will not be released...
>
> So, we want 2.0.30 or .31 or any release. Is there a chance to hope ? :)

When it works absolutely perfectly. 2.0.x is assumed to be _very_ stable. It
is important that remains true

Next message: Richard Ketchersid: "Undefined Symbols in 2.1.30"
Previous message: Alan Cox: "Re: your mail"