Re: NO_ATIME missing in 2.0.30

Daniel Quinlan (quinlan@transmeta.com)
10 Apr 1997 02:48:41 -0700


David S. Miller <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu> writes:

> Linus thought the NO_ATIME fix in there was unclean, I agreed with
> him, the way it is done in 2.1.x is much saner so I will try and get
> that version of the changes backported.

Other than NO_ATIME changes (and disk system improvements such as
RAID), is there anything else worth doing to improve performance
specifically for news servers?

-- 
Daniel Quinlan (at work)
quinlan@transmeta.com           http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/