Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)

Gerd Knorr (kraxel@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Sat, 3 May 1997 08:52:07 +0200

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: On the subject of the VFS layer (was Re: VFS questions)"
Previous message: Harald Milz: "Re: NT/Linux Driver?"
In reply to: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)"
Next in thread: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)"
Reply: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)"

>The bigest complication (again IMHO) is the necessity of keeping both
>old and new versions in /lib.

This is required only for *real old* a.out binaries (< libc 4.4.4 or so),
which have the libc path hardcoded.

Gerd

-- 
Gerd Knorr <kraxel@cs.tu-berlin.de> |  Where these funny chars come from ???
http://www.cs.tu-berlin.de/~kraxel/ |  [ ... ] Aha, the debug code is broken!

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: On the subject of the VFS layer (was Re: VFS questions)"
Previous message: Harald Milz: "Re: NT/Linux Driver?"
In reply to: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)"
Next in thread: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)"
Reply: Paul H. Hargrove: "Re: This thread is silly (Re: Dropping a.out support)"