Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Carlo Wood: "Re: 2.0.30 crash in lock_remove_locks (cont'd)"
• Previous message: tzeruch@ceddec.com: "[2.1.38] isdn_net.c - problem with clear_bit"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"
• Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"
• Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"
• Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"

What is the point in having "zImage" at all? Why not build "bzImage"
by default? Is there any advantage to the former?

Regards,

Y.

On Fri, 16 May 1997, David S. Miller wrote:

> Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 10:07:33 +0300 (EET DST)
> From: Jari Soderholm <kernel@atmweb.ntc.nokia.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
>
> Has anyone thought if there cuold be something to do
> with this matter ?
>
> Yep, it's called "make bzImage"
>
>

• Next message: Carlo Wood: "Re: 2.0.30 crash in lock_remove_locks (cont'd)"
• Previous message: tzeruch@ceddec.com: "[2.1.38] isdn_net.c - problem with clear_bit"
• In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"
• Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"
• Reply: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"
• Reply: Werner Almesberger: "Re: 'System is too big' is becoming a problem"