You are missing the point totally. Nobody is arguing against having colour
console messages under certain circumstances, its just that it does not
belong in the kernel.
Just because something is written by a printk doesn't mean that its going
to be displayed on a console. The job of displaying the message or writing
it to a file or even throwing it away is with sysklogd or whatever you
have. Therefore it is the job of that program to decide how to display it,
coloured or not.
A colour patch for sysklogd would probably be welcomed, but it must take
into account the fact that the messages may be going to a file instead.
It must look up the suitable control codes to produce the colours, it is
wrong to assume that all the world is a Linux type console, and of course
not all screens can display colour anyway, eg VT100s.
The colour printk patch is stupid.
> All The Best,
> Marco
>
> "Death can come quickly to a market leader."
>
> - Bill Gates, "The Road Ahead" -
Jonathan
PS In a bad mood because my exams start tommorrow.
-- +----------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ | e-mail: jsn@cs.nott.ac.uk | Telephone: +44 (0) 973 695261 | +----------------------------------+---------------------------------------+ | Author of Linux kernel AX.25, NET/ROM and Rose. | +--------------------------------------------------------------------------+