Re: 2.0.31 : please!

Dan Hollis (
Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:10:50 -0700 (PDT)

On Sun, 13 Jul 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Seriously - it appears that a critical mass of developers has decided
> that a stable, working kernel isn't worth the bother. I find this
> highly troubling. Anybody want to bet that 2.2 will be left in a fairly
> unusable state too, while the developers start out on 2.4?

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

There are a number of problems that need to be sorted out before the next
patch. You don't want 2.0.31 to be _less_ stable than 2.0.30 do you?