Re: 2.0.31 : please!

Dan Hollis (goemon@sasami.anime.net)
Sun, 13 Jul 1997 19:10:50 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: NIIBE Yutaka: "A patch to allow INITRD to compile (against 2.1.44)"
Previous message: Russell Coker - mailing lists account: "New Tulip driver - was: Tulip driver & 2.0.30-pre-patch-2"
In reply to: Bob Lorenzini: "Re: Huge uptimes & cosmic rays"
Next in thread: Jon Lewis: "Re: 2.0.31 : please!"

On Sun, 13 Jul 1997, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Seriously - it appears that a critical mass of developers has decided
> that a stable, working kernel isn't worth the bother. I find this
> highly troubling. Anybody want to bet that 2.2 will be left in a fairly
> unusable state too, while the developers start out on 2.4?

Wrong, wrong, wrong.

There are a number of problems that need to be sorted out before the next
patch. You don't want 2.0.31 to be _less_ stable than 2.0.30 do you?

-Dan

Next message: NIIBE Yutaka: "A patch to allow INITRD to compile (against 2.1.44)"
Previous message: Russell Coker - mailing lists account: "New Tulip driver - was: Tulip driver & 2.0.30-pre-patch-2"
In reply to: Bob Lorenzini: "Re: Huge uptimes & cosmic rays"
Next in thread: Jon Lewis: "Re: 2.0.31 : please!"