Re: 2.0.31
Tatu Vaajalahti (tatu@tatu.pp.sci.fi)
Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:24:38 +0300 (EET DST)
On 14-Jul-97 Steve VanDevender wrote:
>I've actually been running pre-2.0.31-2 on my home machine since not
>long after it came out, with few problems (the oddest thing happening
>was having init die on me, but only once -- I may still have the oops in
>my log files if anyone's interested). It's been stable for me, although
>I have a rather lightly-loaded system. And the 2.0.30 system I maintain
>for a friend has had an excellent record so far. Admittedly, it's also
>not a super-loaded system, but it stays up for weeks and hasn't had to
>be rebooted for crashes.
Here is statistics from one of our servers.If this is unstable, I would
be very happy to see a stable system :)
Linux www 2.0.30 #1 Wed Apr 9 10:18:31 EET DST 1997 i586
1:21am up 73 days, 13:29, 1 user, load average: 1.08, 1.02, 1.03
cpu 136802115 695 43638538 455147160
disk 15779140 1647152 0 0
disk_rio 1759104 625981 0 0
disk_wio 14020036 1021171 0 0
disk_rblk 6850692 4997024 0 0
disk_wblk 28174202 8168624 0 0
page 11901370 19448808
swap 555693 32922
intr 716904796 635588508 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63889983 0 0 1 17426296 0
ctxt 4053830888
btime 862563109
processes 2835278