Re: 2.0.31 : please!

edgy (edgy@alliedtours.com)
Wed, 16 Jul 1997 12:59:25 -0500 (EDT)


On Thu, 17 Jul 1997, Marcus B wrote:

> Well think of it this way, 2.0 seems to be the only stable kernel
> release that has a lot of work done to it, just look at 1.2 (13?) and
> 1.0 (9), and with the really big things happening in the last year (new
> found popularity of Linux), I'm amazed they got this much done.
> Also if someone can donate a Web site I'll happily (do my best) to keep
> a bug list site going, probably with a similar feel as LinuxHQ, how does
> that sound?
>
> MABS -=marcus@cwi.net.au=-
>

I could donate the web site, the machine, the 10 Mbit link, and the space,
but I don't know enough about HTML to help with the CGI's and the HTML code
for it.

The machine's running 2.0.30, but it's been pretty stable. :-)

Ben