> 2.0.30 should
> IMHO have never occured, it was forced on people by the perpetual whining
> of some folks for 2.1.x features in 2.0.x.
That's the wrong way, IMHO. I believe, 2.0.3x features add-on should be
suspended, and only bugfixes should be included in 2.0.31. I believe.
> Alan
Egor Egorov, ComputerWorld/Kiev, egor@fastware.kiev.ua
Nothing in this message relates in any way with ComputerWorld/Kiev or IDG.
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GMC/FA/CS dx s+:- a? C+++ UBLC*++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o+ K? w--- O!
!M V? PS! PE! Y? PGP++@ t@ 5@ X@ R++@ tv++@ b+++ DI? D++() G !e h* r? z?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------