Re: The i2o Bus: A Conspiracy Against Free Software? (fwd)

Tethys (tethys@ml.com)
Fri, 18 Jul 1997 15:11:39 +0100


>> I suspect that if i2o peripherals become popular, free operating systems
>> will be locked out from running on PC hardware.
>
>I've got 2 words for this (if it's true): REVERSE ENGINEER.
>It's been done before, and it'll be done again...

Depending on what you're reverse engineering, it may also be illegal.
However, you should be able to apply dirty/clean room techniques to
it to achieve the same effect.

Also, wouldn't this be anti-competitive practice? They're preventing
OS vendors who want to ship source from being able to support the
hardware needed to retain market share. Maybe one of them will sue,
be it RedHat, Caldera, BSDI or whoever...

The other option would be for a company (or individual) to sign the
NDA, develop the driver and make it available as a binary only kernel
module. Not ideal, I know, but it would at least be one solution.
Wasn't something like this done for AFS support?

Tet

--
``There appear to be few if any technical reasons to move from UNIX to
  Windows NT. The performance of Linux exceeds that of NT 4.0 and Linux
  appears to be more reliable.''          -- David Korn, AT&T, author of ksh
--------------------+--------------+----------------------------------------
tethys@ml.com       |  Micro$oft:  | Linux,  the choice of a GNU generation.
tet@astradyne.co.uk | Just say no! | See http://www.uk.linux.org for details