Karl
-=+=-=+=-=+-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-
= Karl M Majer | Telephone: (703) 437.8296 =
= | =
= majer@etnalabs.com | Etnalabs International =
-=+=-=+=-=+-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-=+=-
On Sun, 20 Jul 1997, James Mohr wrote:
> I personally would like to see an indication of how long it took for the bugs to get:
>
> 1) fixed
> 2) included in a new stable kernel
>
> If we can *show* people how fast bugs are getting fixed, that'll definately be points
> against NT.
>
> Regards,
>
> jimmo
> ---------------------------------------
>
> "Science has promised man power...But, as so often happens when people
> are seduced by promises of power, the price is servitude and impotence.
> Power is nothing if it is not the power to choose."
>
> Joseph Weizenbaum of MIT said in reference to computers.
>
> ----------
> From: Marcus B[SMTP:marcus@cwi.net.au]
> Sent: Sonntag, 20. Juli 1997 12:04
> To: Linux-Kernel Mail-list
> Subject: Linux Kernel Bug-list Website
>
> I have all of the preliminary stuff done, but I would like to have some
> questions about bug fixes:
> 1. After a bug has been fixed and published on the site, Where does it
> go then?
> 2. Who will notify me if the bug-fix is official enough to take the bug
> report off the site?
> 3. Bug-fixes will stay on the site for apron. 7 days, is this long
> enough? or can it be shorter?
> 4. Should the fixes be kept on the site?
> 5. Should the fixes be published somewhere else as well?
>
> I would like to know the answers ASAP so the site can go up, ASAP.
> Also if anyone thinks of any other questions I should be asking, please
> inform me, and ANSWER them if possible
> --
> Segment Fault (Windows Dumped)
>
> MABS -=marcus@cwi.net.au=-
>
>
>