Re: 2.0.29 and maximum number of user.

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Wed, 10 Sep 1997 07:59:59 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: IP fragmentation problem in the 2.0 kernels ?"
Previous message: Gerd Knorr: "Re: Why does this break under SMP?"
In reply to: Erik Andersen: "Re: Kernel includes and libc6"

> Which makes raid0 just like a single drive that fails, except that you can
> use several cheaper drives to get more bandwidth than any single expensive
> drive, and often at less cost (certainly at less cost / MB).

raid0 is worse than a single drive. Each of the drives can failing losing
the lot - your reliability goes way down. Miguel and co were hacking on
raid1,4,5 - dunno how that is doing right now

Next message: David S. Miller: "Re: IP fragmentation problem in the 2.0 kernels ?"
Previous message: Gerd Knorr: "Re: Why does this break under SMP?"
In reply to: Erik Andersen: "Re: Kernel includes and libc6"