I suppose that if noone can think of a good reason to keep the old mcd
driver around, I could completely drop it from the kernel as part of my
CD-ROM update for the 2.1.x kernel. I pulled an old Mitsumi drive out of
my basement, but I can't say I have ever really used either mcd or mcdx
except for my on-going porting effort. Is anybody out there really
attached to the mcd driver, or should I drop it from the kernel? Does the
kernel really need two Mitsumi proprietary CD-ROM drivers?
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen Web: http://www.inconnect.com/~andersen/
email: andersee@debian.org
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Christian Rost wrote:
> Today I've found out that's impossible to mount a joliet-cdrom with the mcd-
> driver (Kernel 2.1.56) on an old mitsumi double speed cdrom-drive (with his
> own controller-card), neither Joliet-Level 1 nor Level 3:
> > mount -t iso9660 /dev/mcd /mnt
> mount: block device /dev/mcd is write-protected, mounting read-only
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/mcd,
> or too many mounted file systems
>
> On the other hand mcdx works fine :-)
> Now is there any significant reason to use mcd instead of mcdx ?
>
> Ps: Is it possible to use an old CPS SoundblasterPro4 instead of mitsumi's
> proprietary controller card ?
>
> --
> Christian Rost If god had intended
> Knooper Landstr 6f. man to smoke, he
> 24161 Kiel Tel:0431364699 would have set
> mailto: stu30129@mail.uni-kiel.de him on fire
>