Re: updated smbfs for 2.1.60
Aaron Tiensivu (tiensivu@pilot.msu.edu)
Tue, 28 Oct 1997 16:40:37 -0500
> The Win 95 problem was resolved by falling back to info level 1 requests
> if the CONFIG_SMB_WIN95 option is specified. This is not ideal; if your
> environment includes both Win 95 and Win NT, you'll have to decide which
> one you want to work :-( (Or just get rid of Win 95 ...) Eventually I
> plan to use a run-time test for the type of server.
Unfortunately, this makes smbfs basically useless for me (and I bet a lot of
other people) that dual boot between 95 and NT and wish to use both with their
Linux boxes..
If something could be done to make it "feel" like 2.0.x SMBFS (but better, of
course), that would be great! :)