> Unfortunately, this makes smbfs basically useless for me (and I bet a lot of
> other people) that dual boot between 95 and NT and wish to use both with their
> Linux boxes..
>
> If something could be done to make it "feel" like 2.0.x SMBFS (but better, of
> course), that would be great! :)
IMO 2.1.60 smbfs is already much better than the 2.0.xx counterpart.
The present problems stem from a lack of beta testers. I have only an
NT system to test against, and smbfs works extremely well on my system.
So, if you'd like to join in helping make it better, please test it out
and help me track down the remaining problems.
Regards,
Bill