Re: again security proposal

Rob Hagopian (hagopiar@vuser.vu.union.edu)
Wed, 31 Dec 1997 10:33:51 -0500 (EST)


> Thoose, who wants it this way - will enable it. For example, near
> everybody who runs ifmail, will need it.

That was the idea from the start (of this thread).

> I can even imagine not-owner-hardlinks as not the only security option in
> security options config sections.

Exactly. There's the noexec stack patch (the latest version that _does_
work with trampolines) too.
-Rob H.