Re: 2.1.80 no-go

Timothy Murphy (tim@turing.maths.tcd.ie)
Wed, 21 Jan 1998 12:41:06 +0000 (GMT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Erik Corry: "Re: NT vs Linux (the inevitable holy war solved!)"
Previous message: Trevor Johnson: "BSD process accounting in Linux 2.1.80 won't compile; likely problem with sys_sparc32.c"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"
Next in thread: Linux-Kernel Mail Account: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"
Reply: Linux-Kernel Mail Account: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"

>
> If your machine is not an SMP system then booting an SMP kernel is now likely
> to fail quite comprehensively. Your machine probably doesnt even have an APIC
> on it..

Isn't it rather crazy then not to include SMP in .config .
I don't understand the reasoning behind the omission.

Next message: Erik Corry: "Re: NT vs Linux (the inevitable holy war solved!)"
Previous message: Trevor Johnson: "BSD process accounting in Linux 2.1.80 won't compile; likely problem with sys_sparc32.c"
In reply to: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"
Next in thread: Linux-Kernel Mail Account: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"
Reply: Linux-Kernel Mail Account: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"
Reply: Alan Cox: "Re: 2.1.80 no-go"