> On Thu, Jan 22, 1998 at 07:02:06PM -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
> > The MIPS architecture is missing an IOCTL define used in
> > drivers/char/tty_io.c. This is against 2.1.81. Without this patch, I do
> > not believe that the tty support for MIPS will compile.
>
> Indeed - but MIPS isn't yet fully integrated into Linus' kernel. I ran
> out of time temporarily while working on that :-(
The original patch was against 2.1.81-pre1; the TIOCGSID #define made it
into 2.1.81 final.
Are there historical reasons why linux-MIPS uses radically different ioctl
numbers from those of the other linux ports? I think there's only 8
ioctls that have the same values in linux-MIPS and linux-x86/m68k/ARM...
--Scott
@ @
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-oOO-(_)-OOo-=-=-=-=-=
C. Scott Ananian: cananian@lcs.mit.edu / Declare the Truth boldly and
Laboratory for Computer Science/Crypto / without hindrance.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology /META-PARRESIAS AKOLUTOS:Acts 28:31
-.-. .-.. .. ..-. ..-. --- .-. -.. ... -.-. --- - - .- -. .- -. .. .- -.
PGP key available via finger and from http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~cananian