Re: transparent proxy not operationalal in 2.1

A.N.Kuznetsov (kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru)
Fri, 30 Jan 1998 21:28:22 +0300

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: [RFC] preliminary patch for files struct"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.1.82 -- Aiee, killing interrupt handler and panic"
Maybe in reply to: Felix von Leitner: "transparent proxy not operationalal in 2.1"

In article <19980130161326.43332@math.fu-berlin.de> you wrote:
: Yes, I know, I have found a few mailing list archives about transparent
: proxying that say that it is inoperational in 2.1, but apparently nobody
: bothers? The mails indicated that it's broken for over a _year_ now and
: it still does not work. Can this be? Does nobody use transparent
: proxying?

Yes, you are the first who is bothered by it
(at least in this mailing list)
Nobody asked to repair it, so that I saw no reasons to be bothered too :-)
If new socket hashing scheme did not break it too, I can repair it.
But I need someone who is ready to test it.

Alexey Kuznetsov

Next message: Bill Hawes: "Re: [RFC] preliminary patch for files struct"
Previous message: Linus Torvalds: "Re: 2.1.82 -- Aiee, killing interrupt handler and panic"
Maybe in reply to: Felix von Leitner: "transparent proxy not operationalal in 2.1"