Re: MILO vs BIOS on Linux/Intel.

David Woodhouse (Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk)
Wed, 11 Feb 1998 13:24:10 +0000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: mshar@vax.ipm.ac.ir: "How to read-protect a vm_area?"
Previous message: Alan Osborne: "Re: Quake dies under 2.1.86?"
Maybe in reply to: Oleg Gusev: "MILO vs BIOS on Linux/Intel."
Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: MILO vs BIOS on Linux/Intel."

oleg@usm.uni-muenchen.de said:
> I'm wondering how difficult it would be to
> put MIniLOader in flash like it was done on Alpha instead
> of that LILO/MBR mess ?

There's not going to be enough room in with the normal BIOS. However, if
you've got a network card with space for a ROM, you could put it in there.

---- ---- ----
David Woodhouse, Robinson College, CB3 9AN, England. (+44) 0976 658355
Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk http://dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk
finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk for PGP key.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: mshar@vax.ipm.ac.ir: "How to read-protect a vm_area?"
Previous message: Alan Osborne: "Re: Quake dies under 2.1.86?"
Maybe in reply to: Oleg Gusev: "MILO vs BIOS on Linux/Intel."
Next in thread: Miquel van Smoorenburg: "Re: MILO vs BIOS on Linux/Intel."