Re: Oops: 0000 (2.1.89)

MOLNAR Ingo (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Sun, 8 Mar 1998 16:22:20 +0100 (CET)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Matthias Urlichs: "Re: inode->i_count security hole"
Previous message: A.N.Kuznetsov: "Re: bug in 2.1.89 include/net/sock.h?"

an oops here too after 2 minutes of 2.1.89 uptime, fault on address
00000058, call trace:

>>EIP: c013639a <find_inode+16/34>
Trace: c0136630 <iget+48/98>
Trace: c0143ad0 <ext2_lookup+5c/84>
Trace: c0130fc4 <real_lookup+48/70>
Trace: c01311d0 <lookup_dentry+15c/1e8>
Trace: c0130d78 <getname+98/f8>
Trace: c0131289 <__namei+2d/84>
Trace: c012f10e <sys_newlstat+7e/f0>
Trace: c0109f42 <system_call+3a/40>

it's not reproducible, running 2.1.89 since then without any pr

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu

Next message: Matthias Urlichs: "Re: inode->i_count security hole"
Previous message: A.N.Kuznetsov: "Re: bug in 2.1.89 include/net/sock.h?"