Re: mmap() versus read()

MOLNAR Ingo (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Mon, 9 Mar 1998 22:30:33 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 9 Mar 1998, Perry Harrington wrote:

> I think everyone will
> agree that the current clone() method of creating threads is costly
> at best. [...]

uhm, ~20 usecs on a 200 MHz PPro, is that 'costly at best'?

-- mingo

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu