> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 1998 06:41:47 -0600 (CST)
> From: Thomas Molina <tmolina@probe.net>
> To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu
> Subject: Re: Avoiding SMP
> In-Reply-To: <199803100812.VAA10787@caffeine.ix.net.nz>
> Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980310063758.5006B-100000@wr5z>
>
> Why is the SMP line uncommented by default anyway? If most people are
> building UP kernels, the default should be UP IMHO.
>
> Because His Holiness uses SMP?
>
>
Probably because 2.1.x is development tree, and we want a stable SMP
before stable tree (2.2.x).
To make it stable, we must test it thoroughly, do we?
And that comment about His Holiness is probably correct too. :)
Reagrds,
-- Posted by Zlatko Calusic E-mail: <Zlatko.Calusic@CARNet.hr> --------------------------------------------------------------------- Took an hour to bury the cat. Silly thing kept moving.- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu